Having in hand a letter confirming all «Commercial Enterprises », can benefit from a «Subvention salariale», according to a letter named «Lettre d'admissibilité à la mesure Subvention salariale », old compagny like Technicolor were facing important lawsuit against using part of that Subvention and not returning the «Subvention» to their remployes... Resulting a forced closure of Technicolor, they continue to being investigated, because not only closing the compagny can fix something withdraw from Governement...
And Patrick.Riendeau case... According to Phéromone inc. initially named VDL2 inc. A Lawyer working internally as Human Ressource was aggreing such Subvention being raised to 164000$ per year as long a compagny is qualified to respect such Subvention and shall use it too pay him only... Even agreeing such internal agreement between This Name and Associate, they shall return it in whole... This mean, even inventing such investment, money retribute from such salary, must be refunded in whole... Having Lawyer concluding this compagny may be holded by him if we are facing such problems too...
So, Until October 2 2013, another still available and was not correctly entitled, the person filled with basic element, should contain the entire information like the amount being 164000$ for one year and renewable on demand... But once granted, the Compagny will receive the exact term, because there is a tag following my Personnal account verifying I will earn such money or all money earned lower than this salary are personnal investment made by a compagny or simply are not qualified to subscribe to such Subvention...
- It was also a pleasure ( from Patrick.Riendeau) @ VDL2 and Phéromone to hear Human ressources from other compagny being interviewed by The «Barreau du Québec, Laywer and Notaire, from possible succession » disqualifying such compagny after personally postulated during job daytime to see them being revoked...
The Holding a "pandora box" phenomenon I should confirm .
So starting to August 23 I should post the document information, and I should receive no call at all after hearing such abomination from other Human Ressources confirming directly to a Laywer how fruitfull they should be with money from governement...
This might conclude also, I should earn from governement being unable to provide me a Job and it's the «Barreau du Québec », that will confirm this...
| X | Text may contains errors, syntax errors or lexical error... |
| X | Now with SpellChecking and Editable text. Up to you to get something correct. |
1 No Interest 2 Somewhat good 3 Good 4 Special.
