TheySaySomethingInterrestingApparently: septembre 2015

〈0,1,1,2,3,5,8,13,21,...〉






Iterpipes, Between Bash and Hash-bash

A library for running shell pipelines using shell-like syntax

Enables piping infinite streams through shell pipelines in Python

xhtml-css Bivalidator

Check your markup and style validity

Advanced

Just type or paste an URL in the form above, and click on "check it" to see the magic. If you want to fine tune your validation, click on the "advanced" link. That's it!

Yet Another Comprehensive Content

Like, Young's modulus is a vibrating variation inside a solid... The times it take to respanw to an excess of energy is what molding apparence may look to not-so solid thing's... Like this Blog when adding content, the effor is like slapping it and the time it goes back, centered... we consider being more stable than usual...

mardi 1 septembre 2015

Supreme Court does protect in this way...

« Shall » have the motus prior to have a reason to protect ,

« Will » have the definition of the pendum to transmit the information properly.

And will inform you about the "way" we should consider them if you are prone to be concerned .

In some way people adopted by « Supreme Court » are unique case and this in favor of a self root-stem giving them time to form many root, many descendant rather than a future « stem », ready to "hybrid" and duplicate, a process that failed and continue to fail ....

Like this adopted case had to grow, this adopted was also informed about future event occurring will have issues. Like bank to block your account or compagny with 3 letters Sign, had wiped acces and refuse electronic transfert following a DMCA act. While a advocate not from « Barreau du Québec », calling in Québec to ask to a citizen to remove code, and access, even if password was a var in memory and basic command showing example of correction to implement over a LDAP tree, to remove you sign and probably dreaming letting me moving to Troy just to see this infrastructure falling....

My demand of password was received by a Canadian agent  member from that « Barreau du Québec » ; If I put the plug out I will receive answer like .

- It's like RRQ sheet, it inform you about the amount, but contributing  to it can be done only by working... Nothing else.

- If you do receive, Revenu du Québec sheet by mail, and you had sign for «Partenariat entrepreneur , employé», they had safely report you into impossibility to had linked you Revenu to it, you do stuff on your way for you own purpose, but most Canadian does not touch to that case... A case something that give around half of million and 2 million the rest of your life, it's denatured person will try to work and having theirs own recipe in life.... Demotivating if you do touching money from Partenariat ...

So Supreme Court does also inform, California, New york will lose an important power by unilaterally touch account ; Even if there is a strong relation between personal account used to receive my income from 2012 jobs and relation to my internal credential . So Orange County will take place soon, and that 3 letters corporation old from century died in the hand of « Supreme Court ». Why not, United State had lost in case of adopting that stem . The « Supreme Court » continue to investigate in any departed work...

- So we are before September 7, no sign of followed act from Another type of Agent working close to that «Partenariat entrepreneur , employé» had already concluded a fallback date which is critics ; If the tool depending from that «3 letters corporation old from century » action to allow electronic transfers , or uses of Terminal-Sendmoney , to assign Gazillion, like student from 2nd grade from IT at cegep Rosemont learn . Even United State had right to use that Terminal-Sendmoney to correct their inflation and increasing their value... It's old joke from the « The Godfather » , to contact a Diplomat to increase the inflation by signing a diplomatic act . You do have to mess less with gun for moving money ...

By the way what they learn a cegep Rosemont , Couple of thing, but some have seriously pushed the teacher out for conflict with me or Cobol is just out after 2001

They learn :

  1. Cobol
  2. Summing a  code from NAS.
  3. Having debate for my NAS was elligible
    • To change the title
    • To earn a Gazillion for all the know problem meet on earth since that decision of replacing homo-sapiens from 24,23,21 pairs/gene by a 32 pairs/gene.

- While the code have been examined , The teacher have really insist to tell me where I have found my NAS because it fit in every situation. He still believing I have stole it.... 

- For all other guy believing we working for honest cause ,
 - We do presenting reality like this ...

- We celebrating like we were never meet, we are all new after last conclusion to revoke or erasing members, dying with theirs passion or leaving  with their goal, remaining candidate have to receive the new role and so on... So we showing to you 14 days after you have really take contact with us, we do celebrating our new turn during that moment...

I will avoid sending another contact soon unlike December 2009-2010, the ACN chapter...



Also I will refuse to remove any other information from any place ; In Québec we are invited to enter into « Barreau du Québec », to complete any of « Barreau » If you do trust your "intention in action" as virtue , and leaving if you to fail your « Barreau » and continue to believe it does not impact on reality . In some case like if "The guys pretending rulling the century old compagny", might have idea to live in Québec they will :

- Invite you to be a member, and all other close to your wellfare-infractructure in short your management team , you may fail your « Barreau », it's about same called dismantlement because you do not respect the « Supreme Court » , you may live your live after like any citizen except a clause that should be respected having to end .

Many does not really understand being pointed by the inflated balloon created out of the « Supreme Court » environment it's like being out of civility, it's really far west in your context .

« Supreme Court », have seriously laugh over adopted case.... Untouchable he can be, It can't collect infraction for eternity, and it driving the actual structure which is already a falling  inferno ; we can't juge it for the big inferno we are giving, so collection case, de-imparting or simply gluing back imparted position because it's useless, cooption  of process give us mirror of what is critical. But messing with immaterial of human or group of one-element from that other group is also « La Haye » in International Justice ; Like Swizterland notariat does not sound « Big » Succession to process or interim .