No, this is not the GanjaWest of Hash offering you the Root-beer Hash bubble in the list of the new arrival, than during our last hot week about a week ago I wasn't sit on my chair and I was not enjoying about it but exercises. But commune enough than on the road does have a chance to expel out of dark-blue big European char and smelling about old-spice in bubble and appear to also smell the Root-beer. So you all know it's at Ganjawest.co and have nothing here because Java is not only coffee, found the taste of C++ ??? it doesn't have !
It wasn't the case of 1 month ago doing some question about speed processing of md5sum and asking if it's possible to make myself easily the transfer information with an environment transfer mechanism from C/C++ does skip in possibility to overflow because it's from memory to memory and does not pass by your hand.
So with c_read_var.c it start how I should get the information from the bash shell environment variables and than starting there you do add the md5 library do what they say... Up to three or four does appear on the web and one seems to not be safe... What I should do !!!
A smoking situation, developing a brute-force digest to test if a short decipher back from combination does give the correct answer and prove your work is safe. Rather than I was surprise to fall on the "ZZZZ" instead of "TEST" with prompt_md5_check application with using the HashBruteTest.java found on stack-exchange for md5 application, it give some-one effort to provide information to help in a case my loop in cipher-md5 format will leak and might ruin my tiny helper for arduino-cli...
That part of telling someday a shell-script from a loop providing the loop exit and the hash to someday wish to pass an hash to continue from the moment the loop stop is just and MESSY and REALLY LONG way to get back your things, as sometimes is also the same in processing function name in compilation sometimes they are turning the name and a lot of information within into an hash and manually remove the compiled retrieve part sound really a bad compilation but apparently exist to supply name in a constructor and then, that one come possible as long the compilation add information in a steady way and not many bit or you do have to develop a sub-8 bit parity filter in the key combination. The HashBruteTest does work in a Char resolution as if a compiler add 5 bit to tell something you are cook in a hash generation and must query the name into their hash name to yourself make some exception. but I doubt.
Ask to Jon Ericksson for a post situation where you have your pointer set on the next terminal action and do have to supply a finite byte information for finite feed. It's truly explain it does and computer have to itself process the hash to get something but what ?
So this weekend I drop everything only alike Jon Ericksson will also have the opportunity to explode the mechanism of variable storing limit which is tinier than forcing Perl to generate a 2^32 for a buffer overflow, you'll deal with variable and their size withing you stack-pile bug.
In the Java side the HashBruteTest does not retrieve correctly the char not wished. But it's matter of time before I dip back in, like using percent instead of a long scrolling of number, an so on.
Computer laboratory are the smallest laboratory and expect for mathematician to have the sheet as the smallest surface expressing such, you dare how computer should continue to represent about what is quantum , right !
