TheySaySomethingInterrestingApparently: About the Bush remembrance of the "Atoms for Peace" act.

〈0,1,1,2,3,5,8,13,21,...〉






Iterpipes, Between Bash and Hash-bash

A library for running shell pipelines using shell-like syntax

Enables piping infinite streams through shell pipelines in Python

xhtml-css Bivalidator

Check your markup and style validity

Advanced

Just type or paste an URL in the form above, and click on "check it" to see the magic. If you want to fine tune your validation, click on the "advanced" link. That's it!

Yet Another Comprehensive Content

Like, Young's modulus is a vibrating variation inside a solid... The times it take to respanw to an excess of energy is what molding apparence may look to not-so solid thing's... Like this Blog when adding content, the effor is like slapping it and the time it goes back, centered... we consider being more stable than usual...

lundi 9 mars 2026

About the Bush remembrance of the "Atoms for Peace" act.

By the past George W. Bush had signed these Act:

citation from A.I.:

"George W. Bush (2003): Commemorated the 50th anniversary of Eisenhower's initiative, reaffirming U.S. commitment to preventing proliferation while sharing peaceful nuclear technology."

 "George W. Bush (2006): Signed the Henry J. Hyde United States-India Peaceful Atomic Energy Cooperation Act, a key piece of legislation under the "Atoms for Peace" umbrella.

 Since there in 2026 we will hit the 70 anniversary of Eisenhower's initiative ; Stop drastically at 69 year long initiative. Trump apparently not sign it, and end it and reverse it into security wisdom he plaid.

 While in 2006 George W. Bush does sign the Eisenhower's initiative which lead to adoption of the Atomic Energy Cooperation Act, He also sign in 2003 a reaffirmation of U.S. commitment to preventing proliferation while sharing peaceful nuclear technology. This was in the legislation under the "Atoms for Peace" umbrella. We do ask today did Donald J. Trump had sign it to continue or simply not put his big signature over "Atoms for Peace Act". only JD Vance or Elon Musk may know which act was and wasn't, but Trump made a common of on of them being the 238 signatures He has to fulfill he add the comment:

 "With this one we're gonna into war".

And turn the act and continue to read.  

 And all the signature is after held somewhere where Republican can confirm or not if this act is legitimately a way American out-threaten other country by inviting them to sign and share technology and after resigning the initiative and going in war against them. 

One of the potent reality developed by Canadian where actually since Jean-Charest we stop using it is to irradiate commonly spice into radioactive dump and prove it keep aging spice to not develop strong disease coming from big bacteria. Iran was one of them using radiation to threat Malaria from irradiating supply that are used to cure Malaria itself from bacteria entering into conjunction of infection propagated by mosquito.  

What we know about Trump in 2026:

  • Executive Order 14299: Focused on deploying advanced nuclear reactor technologies for national security.
  • Regulatory Reform: Aimed to speed up licensing and modernize nuclear power plant regulations.
  • Support for AI/Defense: Specifically targeted the power needs for AI data centers and military installations.
  • Industrial Base: Invoked the Defense Production Act to secure necessary fuel supplies for the nuclear sector.
  •  

     Belong to information found inside IAEA(1). for SMR(2), United State own up to 22 project including HOLOS-SQUAD truck sized reactor which apparently bring in demonstration since 2024, will lack in uranium soon or later. 

    For us Canadian we have 5 projects with one with American called STARCORE, other are: 

    • CANDU SMR 
    • IMSR400, 
    • SSR-W, 
    • ARC-100
    • STARCORE 

    The ARC-100 a Clean Energy Canada is about to get the license for to prepare the site. The STARCORE is at the projected deployment (start of construction to commissioning). The CANDU SMR is still in waiting to operate and will be in services in 2028, but predict having the concrete for 2025 and start building it. The SSR-W from Molex did receive funding in 2021 but IAEA did not receive new in 2022 for all other milestone. At glance the IMSR400 have received an award in 2020 for Strategic Innovation Fund (SIF) Award from Canadian Government, they are about to secure necessary licenses in 2026 and yet haven't talk about operation.  

    Actually waging in Carney view, itself may share the force between SMR go good to land into military services to accelerate such development, and barely adopt possible enrichment or uranium into plutonium. Will create conjunction of Army receiving 84 Billion in development including surging in the dark upon mass invasion and gripping modern war head to European MIG-29 require money to start, but make money.

     

    It's not explain into the SMR booklet but excepting the CANDU SMR, some cited from the Canadian, some of the 5 reactors in small format are fast-neutron and using metal cooling like lead-mercury / sodium coolant and still having and exhaust for collection and safe depot registration for dumping nuclear really heavy compound. Up to an agreement with European we can even share this type of supply for apparent MIG-29 special adaptation from European into small missile devices for venting exposed with contractual reality to afford nuclear head under 125 Kiloton used for venting and blowing target rather exposing hard and strong radiation. It's only creating heat and less radiation but use common plutonium. And give to Canadian to tie with Europe instead to sell the fuel to U.S.A. Next to ready about Orin game call 'Wing Commander" with adapted MIG-29 craft with nuclear war head of low Joule impact to promote a reversal of aircraft-carrier by using a war-head 100 meter ahead of a aircraft-carrier seriously kept it out of the flow. 

     

     The other reality propose STARCORE will have problem to start. Still serious agreement with Trump,  IAEA, had noticed the whole Uranium we get out of Alberta/Saskatchewan do produce for 3 Billions in $US for us. As since Trump put 25% tariff for the intake of all rare-earth. It does tell them this winter will cost more in uranium since we apparently and exclusively provide them raw. And since they do require to enrich it it take time and possibly and huge increase since they had to deal with Canadian with 2 times menace to increase by 100% tariffs everything. They have to open themself into mining their own land to afford getting the Uranium. Beside the fact we join Australia in providing to Atomic Energy Cooperation Act friend only such Uranium. It include providing to India, Iran, Czech and friend of the Russia Federation (which is not Ukrainian, but all the border around Russia itself). While country like China, Central-Russia are autonomous with that. 

     The other reality is toward Albertan, we don't know what is going up with their delegation to go in Washington and to talk about their independence, but there is clear view telling they might turn their feet back and refusing to get only live in english, to stop publication in either french and amerindian, to stop education in prohibited tongue like french and  amerindian, still to recognize amerindian like second zone human ready to be deported in desert like Navajo Amerindian. They may ask to un-build the petrol factory to bring back in Texas and surely to provide all the good like wheat and all they found in mining including uranium to a freeway to avoid tariff. Since Judge a recognize the tariff are illegal it's sure some mining company will surely get something out of it. But will you believe they can be bad as this with Albertan since it's not democrat at the power and Trump itself spill out too many treaty that make America a loosy force by itself, betraying everyone even friend. 

     

     

    IAEA(1): International Atomic Energy Agency 

    SMR(2) : Small Modular Reactor